[nesfa-reading-group] (no subject)

[David G. Grubbs]

I asked a similar question.  The answer seems to be that books are separate
enough to make sense on their own.


On Sun, May 9, 2021 at 5:09 PM Chip Hitchcock <cjhi at newcastle2.com> wrote:

> the question on *Children of Ruin* reminds me to ask: was there a reason
> the proposer suggested a book which is not the first in a series (or worse,
> duology)? Can anyone who has already read both comment on how safe/sane/...
> it is to just read this one without reading *Children of Time*? These are
> both monster books; I'm torn between
> falling-into-the-middle-with-no-idea-wtf-is-going-on and committing a large
> chunk of time to playing catchup.
>
> /CHip
> _______________________________________________
> reading-group mailing list
> reading-group at lists.nesfa.org
> https://listsmgt.nesfa.org/mailman/listinfo/reading-group
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listsmgt.nesfa.org/pipermail/reading-group/attachments/20210509/33f1a424/attachment.htm>